Updated: June 11, 2009;
The results correspond to WPRO profile-fitting on
the *coadd* (not the frames), using a set of PSFs and
PSFuncs built by T. Jarrett using the Frank Masci mosaics
of the NEP & SEP (combined PSF).
IRAC1 |
IRAC2 |
IRAC3 |
IRAC4 |
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
Updated: Mar 23, 2009; new WPRO weighting and PSFuncs
IRAC1 |
IRAC2 |
IRAC3 |
IRAC4 |
MIPS-24 |
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
Updated: Mar 10, 2009; old weighting and PSFuncs
IRAC1 |
IRAC2 |
IRAC3 |
IRAC4 |
MIPS-24 |
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
Chi^2 Distribution
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO vs. WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WPRO
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
WAPP
vs.
WAPPCO
|
SEP Photometry: WPRO vs. Coadd Circular Aperture
Updated: Oct 26, 2008
The WPHOT system has been adapted to operate on Spitzer BCDs. The following results
show the SEP WPHOT-WPRO results compared to aperture measurements made with the mosaics
using Jarrett's photometry package. The aperture measurements include an curve-of-growth correction
to adjust to total magnitudes.
-
IRAC-1 SEP
- IRAC-2 SEP
- IRAC-3 SEP
- IRAC-4 SEP
- IRAC binned results, including the
mag offset between WPRO and the aperture photometry. Presumably the WPRO mags will
have to be adjusted by this offset to place it on the proper absolute scale.
SEP Photometry: Comparing Profile-Fitting (WPRO) vs. Aperture Photometry (WAPP)
Updated: Oct 26, 2008
The results below show the pure "BCD" measurements, comparing WPRO (psf-fitting) with
the aperture corrected WAPP (small circular aperture). It is clearly evident that
aperture photometry on the BCDs gives very poor results because of the contamination and
confusion from nearby sources. The psf-fitting measurements and the coadd measurements (see above)
do a much better job and are far more robust.
-
IRAC-1 Mag vs. RMS -- this is mag versus the mag uncertainty, which
for the aperture measuement is basically the RMS in the repeatibility; red = contamination; green = bad pixels within aperture
- IRAC-1 WAPP photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measurements; green == bad pixels; red == contaminated pixels
- IRAC-1 WPRO photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measur
ements; red == N>1 blend
- IRAC-1 WPRO vs. WAPP; red = contamination or Nblend > 1
-
IRAC-2 Mag vs. RMS; red = contamination; green = bad pixels within aperture
- IRAC-2 WAPP photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measur
ements; green == bad pixels; red == contaminated pixels
- IRAC-2 WPRO photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measur
ements; red == N>1 blend
- IRAC-2 WPRO vs. WAPP; red = contamination or Nblend > 1
-
IRAC-3 Mag vs. RMS; red = contamination; green = bad pixels within aperture
- IRAC-3 WAPP photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measur
ements; green == bad pixels; red == contaminated pixels
- IRAC-3 WPRO photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measur
ements; red == N>1 blend
- IRAC-3 WPRO vs. WAPP; red = contamination or Nblend > 1
-
IRAC-4 Mag vs. RMS; red = contamination; green = bad pixels within aperture
- IRAC-4 WAPP photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measur
ements; green == bad pixels; red == contaminated pixels
- IRAC-4 WPRO photometry: single measurements vs. multiple measur
ements; red == N>1 blend
- IRAC-4 WPRO vs. WAPP; red = contamination or Nblend > 1
Epoch 1 (mid August, 2007), IRAC observations of the NEP
-
IRAC-1 (fov ~ 47 arcmin);
mosaic after artifact clean
-
IRAC-2 (fov ~ 47 arcmin);
mosaic after artifact clean
-
IRAC-3 (fov ~ 47 arcmin);
mosaic after artifact clean and
delta-dark subtraction
-
IRAC-4 (fov ~ 47 arcmin);
mosaic after artifact clean
IRAC-4 (fov ~ 47 arcmin)
MIPS Scan Map of the NEP
MIPS Scan Map of the SEP
Proposed IRAC and MIPS AORs for the SEP 'gap'*
*Note: the SEP 'gap' refers to the part of the CVZ that is not
covered by SAGE.
Last update - [21 Oct 2008]
T.H. Jarrett (IPAC/SSC)