Algorithm 2 is designed to detect faint central surface brightness galaxies. This memo describes the results of algor 2 on the Hercules 5 repeat scans.
Images
The following images are the brightest of the LCSB candidates (snr > 5). The list includes real galaxies, false galaxy detections (either faint stars or simply noise bumps) and unknown object (too faint to call).
LCSB galaxies are typically too faint to employ the 'normal galaxy' alorithms to separate stars from extended sources. We do, however, take advantage of the unique property of LCSBs -- they "block up" more efficiently than stars. Our primary discrimanent is to measure the SNR of the source after it has been blocked up (2 X 2, 4 X 4 and 8 X 8). For a faint star (i.e., the only thing left in the coadd after algorithm 1 has processed the coadd) will have a SNR that is small, while a comparably bright galaxy will have a larger SNR (because of course it is extended). We use variations on this theme to further refine the star-galaxy separation.
One kind of false galaxy that is very troublesome to any kind of low surface brightness galaxy detection is not a star, but rather a set of noise bumps (typically more than one, localized to a small area) that mimics a real galaxy. There are many different flavors of this kind of "background' enhancement false detection, including fuzz near bright galaxies -- a particular problem within the Hercules core because of the giant spirals and ellipticals and high density of bright galaxies. There is not much that can be done about these false detections, other than to use a flux filter since they typically are very faint (well beyond the level-1 spec) and often have a low SNR if measured using the "super" coadd (J+H+K). Another nuisance, meteor streaks, are efficiently detected with algorithm 2. A "human-in-the-loop" can easily filter these objects from the database. The plots below show the results.
The following plots/figures contain information with regard to the various parameters computed for LCSB objects. Here is a brief glossary of the nomenclature and terms.
The object flux is computed by integrating either circular or elliptical
apertures that are sequentially increased in size until the
flux growth "converges" as measured by either of two indicators:
(2) the change in mean surface brightness between adjacent aperture-annuli is less than (-3 * sigma), where sigma is the standard deviation of the background counts in the annulus corresponding to a radius = 15 pixels; this criterion is designed to minimized confusion from stars and from background gradients (e.g., nearby extended sources).
JHK: CSB and C5SB
JHK: BSNR
JHK: TSNR
"SUPER" SNR: S2SNR, S4SNR, S8SNR, SSNRMAX
Central Surface Brightness
white filled circles == galaxies
red triangles == false detections
red crosses == artifacts (meteor streaks)
yellow crosses == unknown objects
Blocked JHK-SNR
The dashed blue line represents the threshold that was imposed upon detection: Objects with BSNR < 4 (in all three bands) were considered non-detections. This threshold is imposed to minimize contamination from faint stars. For the objects that survive this cut, the confirmed galaxies, false detections and unknown objects are degenerate in this phase space. Note that most of the objects, real, false and otherwise, are very faint and generally not subject to the level-1 specifications. Another way to view the results is to plot the SNR vs. the uncertainty in the photometry:
Indeed most of the objects have at best 20 or 40%
photometry (isophotal is for the most part better since
the isophotal radius is typically smaller than 10
pixels in radius).
Integrated JHK-SNR
This space is degenerate for the most part.
"Super Coadd" Blocked SNR
Most of the confirmed galaxies have SSNRMAX values greater than 7 or 8, while many false detections have values less than this limit. For the individual SSNR values, S2SNR, S4SNR and S8SNR, it is not clear if galaxies separate from stars. SSNRMAX looks the most promising of the SNR parameters to distinguish stars from galaxies.
Disk Scale Length
For the brighter objects, we can compute the disk scale length by fitting an exponential to the mean surface brightness profile. The results are given here: