T. Jarrett, IPAC
(971001)
In the near-infrared, most galaxies appear smoothly symmetric about the major and minor axis (as opposed to the optical, where the younger population, preferentially distributed in spiral arms, dominate the light, giving a "grainy" appearance to their profiles). Exceptions: irregular galaxies (rare), and galaxies with local stellar contamination (exclusive to high stellar density regions). For the most part, galaxies appear two-fold symmtric, while multiple star groups appear asymmetric.
We can exploit this "feature" to separate galaxies from "false" galaxy detections, including double stars and triple stars. Double stars (and most triples) appear asymetric across the minor axis -- that is to say, if you center the elliptical axis on the primary component of the double star, the resultant profile (one-D or two-D) is asymetric from one side of the major axis to the other. This is also generally the case for triple stars (although you can have configurations of three stars in which the alignment is symmetric across both the minor and major axis -- but these configs are much less common).
One way to measure the "symmetry" of an object is to perform a bi-symmetric spatial autocorrelation. Divide the object in two halfs, given by the minor axis. Rotate one-half 180 degrees and multiply the resultant pieces. The autocorrelation is then normalized by the original galaxy (squared). Mathematically, this is equivalent to:
In order to use low SNR points (which are significant in this exercise, since an absense of flux is meaningful), we account for the flux uncertainty in each pixel. This is done by computing a family of ratios for a given pixel:
In addition to the autocorrelation, we can also compute the ratio of total (integrated) flux between symmtric half pieces. This is a sort of "reduced" autocorrelation between the half pieces.
The final piece of information to glean from bi-symetric cross-correlation is a chi-square test (as proposed by Steve Schneider). The reduced chi-square can be written as:
where p and p* are the points 180 deg apart that are being compared, N is the number of points being compared, and sigma is the pixel noise level (the factor of two is because the difference has a SQRT(2) larger error).
The following gif images shows the object, a real galaxy located near the galactic plane. The first panel shows the raw image (with previously processed objects blanked from the image), and the second panel shows the resultant image after stars have been subtracted. The regions in which stars have been subtracted, and regions in which there was a previously processed object, are not used in the autocorrelation or in the integrated flux ratio measurement.
What does the two-D elliptical profile look like for this object? The following plot shows the derived elliptical aperture for the J band image. The axis ratio is between 0.6 and 0.70, the position angle between 50 and 60 degrees, and the semi-major axis from 12.8 to 13.5 pixels (corresponding to the Kron radius). The red and the green points delineate the two symmetric halfs.
This is not the final aperture used, however. We want to avoid contamination from nearby stars or objects (re: galaxies) previously processed. So we mask those areas with suspected contamination (see first gif image). The red and the white points delineate the two symmetric halfs used in the autocorrelation and integrated flux operations. (note also that we avoid pixels with values lost in the noise -- not shown in the gif below).
Results
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the histogram below.
Integrated flux ratio:
This object -- a real galaxy, which appears to the eye quite symmetric -- is indeed spatially bisymmetric with a mean correlation ratio of 0.99 to 1.0. The integrated flux ratios are not quite so good (except for J), with ratios ranging from 0.76 to 0.99.
****** Alternate Method *************
Here we attempt a different filter method to remove extraneous
low snr points. The approach is to use a integrated flux
threshold criterion. Instead of checking each pixel to see if
it has an SNR greater than some threshold, we integrate the pixel
plus its four nearest neighbors and use the sum to compare with
an N-sigma threshold.
If sum(p) or sum(p*) greater than
N-sigma, then the pixel combination (p,p*) is used in the ratio
computation. Thus for galaxies, even low snr points will
be included in the ratio computation because they
"integrate up", whereas noise bumps around stars may not integrate
up (depending on the severity of the N-sigma threshold).
Although this method should eliminate most low snr points
(particularly around non-galaxies), some will still remain, which
can skew the histogram (since we are taking the ratio of very
small numbers). Consequently; as in the previous method, we allow
a range in values for the ratio (with the range set by the background
noise) -- see the intro of this memo for more details.
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 0.98 +- 0.30 , median = 1.00
K band : mean = 1.01 +- 0.30 , median = 0.99
Results
Integrated flux ratio:
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 1.05 +- 0.31 , median = 1.00
K band : mean = 0.94 +- 0.26 , median = 0.99
Results
Integrated flux ratio:
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 0.99 +- 0.07 , median = 0.99
K band : mean = 0.83 +- 0.57 , median = 0.99
Results
Integrated flux ratio:
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 0.69 +- 0.53 , median = 0.86
K band : mean = 0.80 +- 0.35 , median = 0.97
Results
Integrated flux ratio:
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 0.94 +- 0.45 , median = 0.98
K band : mean = 0.63 +- 0.95 , median = 0.97
Results
Integrated flux ratio:
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 1.06 +- 0.41 , median = 1.00
K band : mean = 0.64 +- 1.63 , median = 0.94
Results
Integrated flux ratio:
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 0.95 +- 0.14 , median = 0.99
K band : mean = 0.93 +- 0.15 , median = 0.99
Results
Integrated flux ratio:
The autocorrelation (p*/p) distribution is shown in the
histogram below.
H band : mean = 0.99 +- 0.76 , median = 0.99
K band : mean = 1.24 +- 1.37 , median = 1.00
Summary Plots
Reduced Chi (derived from the square root of the chi-sqr)
A data set consisting of 7 scans of a high source
density field (glat ~ 5 degrees) have been processed
with the bi-symmetric autocorr algorithm. This field
is chock full of double and triple stars (and quad+ groupings
of stars). Only a few galaxies were extracted, so the
statistics are on the short side. Also, since the source
density is high, the chance of stellar contamination to one
of the galaxies is high -- thus we expect some degree of
asymetry in the detected galaxies.
Some relevant results
are given below. For the full details, see
GALWORKS Performance on a Low GLAT Field
.
The next step is to apply a sliding scale to the
flux ratio computation. Similar to the autocorrelation
ratios, we allow some range in the integrated flux
measurements based on the predicted uncertainty in the
measurement.
new flux measurement:
Reduced Chi
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.96 +- 0.39 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 0.99 +- 0.08 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 1.00 +- 0.19 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 0.98 +- 0.11 , median = 0.99
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 1.0482
H band: 1.0289
K band: 1.1959
Case 2: 12.9 mag galaxy in the galactic plane
upper panels: J band
lower panels: K band
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.97 +- 0.10 , median = 0.99
H band : mean = 1.05 +- 0.21 , median = 1.00
K band : mean = 0.94 +- 0.21 , median = 0.99
J band : 0.59
H band : 0.78
K band : 0.71
****** Alternate Method *************
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.96 +- 0.13 , median = 0.99
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 0.97 +- 0.10 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 1.05 +- 0.21 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 0.94 +- 0.20 , median = 0.99
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 1.0202
H band: 1.0655
K band: 1.1457
Case 3: 13.5 mag galaxy in the galactic plane
upper panels: J band
lower panels: K band
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.97 +- 0.19 , median = 1.00
H band : mean = 0.99 +- 0.05 , median = 0.99
K band : mean = 0.83 +- 0.53 , median = 0.98
J band : 0.77
H band : 0.78
K band : 0.29
****** Alternate Method *************
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.94 +- 0.28 , median = 1.01
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 0.97 +- 0.18 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 0.99 +- 0.05 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 0.84 +- 0.52 , median = 0.99
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 0.7643
H band: 0.6243
K band: 1.1349
Case 4: Double Star in the plane
upper panels: J band
lower panels: K band
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.70 +- 0.38 , median = 0.88
H band : mean = 0.68 +- 0.44 , median = 0.87
K band : mean = 0.80 +- 0.35 , median = 0.97
J band : 0.17
H band : 0.13
K band : 0.38
****** Alternate Method *************
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.71 +- 0.46 , median = 0.76
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 0.69 +- 0.38 , median = 0.76
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 0.67 +- 0.44 , median = 0.86
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 0.81 +- 0.33 , median = 0.97
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 3.5732
H band: 3.5165
K band: 1.6800
Case 5: Double Star in the plane
upper panels: J band
lower panels: K band
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.85 +- 0.29 , median = 0.97
H band : mean = 0.91 +- 0.44 , median = 0.97
K band : mean = 0.64 +- 0.88 , median = 0.97
J band : 0.53
H band : 0.53
K band : 0.50
****** Alternate Method *************
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.86 +- 0.31 , median = 0.98
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 0.86 +- 0.29 , median = 0.97
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 0.67 +- 0.44 , median = 0.86
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 0.64 +- 0.89 , median = 0.97
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 1.7793
H band: 1.8403
K band: 1.5173
Case 6: Triple Star in the plane: compact config
upper panels: J band
lower panels: K band
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 1.01 +- 0.25 , median = 1.00
H band : mean = 1.05 +- 0.35 , median = 1.00
K band : mean = 0.65 +- 0.93 , median = 0.93
J band : 0.95
H band : 0.98
K band : 0.97
****** Alternate Method *************
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 1.01 +- 0.28 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 1.01 +- 0.25 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 1.04 +- 0.34 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 0.75 +- 0.94 , median = 0.94
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 2.0325
H band: 2.2965
K band: 2.8208
Case 7: Triple Star in the plane: quasi-symmetric config
upper panels: J band
lower panels: K band
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.95 +- 0.11 , median = 1.00
H band : mean = 0.96 +- 0.12 , median = 0.99
K band : mean = 0.94 +- 0.14 , median = 0.99
J band : 0.78
H band : 0.76
K band : 0.49
****** Alternate Method *************
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 0.95 +- 0.12 , median = 0.99
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 0.95 +- 0.11 , median = 0.99
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 0.96 +- 0.13 , median = 0.99
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 0.94 +- 0.14 , median = 0.99
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 1.3285
H band: 1.2107
K band: 1.4070
Case 8: Triple Star+ in the plane
upper panels: J band
lower panels: K band
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 1.33 +- 1.10 , median = 1.00
H band : mean = 0.98 +- 0.68 , median = 0.99
K band : mean = 1.22 +- 1.15 , median = 0.99
J band : 0.63
H band : 0.86
K band : 0.35
****** Alternate Method *************
Histogram Statistics:
J band : mean = 1.35 +- 1.29 , median = 1.00
after min/max rejection: J band : mean = 1.31 +- 1.06 , median = 0.99
after min/max rejection: H band : mean = 0.98 +- 0.68 , median = 0.99
after min/max rejection: K band : mean = 1.21 +- 1.13 , median = 1.00
Chi-Sqr
The reduced chi is given below (square root of the chi-sqr):
J band: 2.7638
H band: 1.9643
K band: 2.2148
The max departure is computed by subtracting
(or adding, case being) the errorbar value to the
mean ratio value, and subtracting this result from
unity. Thus it measures the departure from unity
assuming a 1-sigma deviation
from its mean value. This seems to work because
galaxies have fairly symmetric ratios (i.e., close to
unity) while their error bars are small. Doubles and
trips have large errorbars (except the one case in
which the trip is configured in a rather symmetric
fashion) and have mean ratios significantly departing
from unity (especially doubles).
****** Alternate Method *************
filled white circles == galaxies
red triangles == double stars
blue crosses == triple stars
Algor Run on a Large Data Set
galaxies == white filled circles
doubles = red points
triples = blue points
galaxies == white filled circles
doubles = red points
triples = blue points
old flux measurement: flux ratio == INT ( p*) / INT (p)
The flux ratio is then the closest measurement ( of the family
of values) to unity.
where INT (p) is the integrated flux in one of the symmetric
pieces.
family (flux ratio) == INT ( p*) +- del_P* / INT (p) +- del_P
where del_P is the expected uncertainty in the integrated flux
measurement.
galaxies == white filled circles
doubles = red points
triples = blue points
galaxies == white line
doubles = red line
triples = blue line
galaxies == white filled circles
doubles = red points
triples = blue points