Spitzer Observations of the WISE NEP-CVZ

NEP Photometry

The results correspond to WPRO profile-fitting on *coadds* (not the frames), using a set of PSFs and PSFuncs built by TJ using the Frank Masci NEP mosaics.

	MIPS24
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco

Updated: June 21, 2009

The results correspond to WPRO profile-fitting on the 0.4 arcsecond *coadd* (not the frames), using a set of PSFs and PSFuncs built by KAM (IRAC-1 and IRAC-2) & TJ (IRAC-3 and IRAC-4) using the Frank Masci 0.4arcsec NEP mosaics.

NEP 0.4arcsec PSFs w/ 0.4arcsec mosaic -- TJ + KAM PSFs

	IRAC-1	IRAC-2	IRAC-3	IRAC-4
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco

Updated: June 11, 2009

The results correspond to WPRO profile-fitting on the 0.4 arcsecond *coadd* (not the frames), using a set of PSFs and PSFuncs built by KAM using the Frank Masci 0.4arcsec NEP mosaics.

NEP 0.4arcsec PSFs w/ 0.4arcsec mosaic -- KAM PSFs

	IRAC-1	IRAC-2	IRAC-3	IRAC-4
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco

Updated: June 10, 2009

The results correspond to WPRO profile-fitting on the 0.4 arcsecond *coadd* (not the frames), using a set of PSFs and PSFuncs built by T. Jarrett using the Frank Masci 0.4arcsec NEP mosaics.

NEP 0.4arcsec PSFs w/ 0.4arcsec mosaic -- TJ PSFs

	IRAC-1	IRAC-2	IRAC-3	IRAC-4
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco

NEP 0.4arcsec PSFs w/ 1 arcsec mosaic

	IRAC-1
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco

The results correspond to WPRO profile-fitting on the *coadd* (not the frames), using a set of PSFs and PSFuncs built by T. Jarrett using the Frank Masci mosaics of the NEP & SEP.

NEP PSFs

	IRAC-1	IRAC-2	IRAC-3	IRAC-4
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco

NEP+SEP PSFs

	IRAC-1	IRAC-2	IRAC-3	IRAC-4
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco

These results come from the Frame PSFS

	IRAC-1	IRAC-2	IRAC-3	IRAC-4
WPRO-WAPPco vs. WAPPco
delta mags: WPRO vs. WAPPco
delta mags: WAPP vs. WAPPco
delta mags: WPRO repeatability vs. WPRO
delta mags: WPRO repeatability vs. WAPPco

Table notes:

• white points denote Nblend = 1; red points denote Nblend > 1 (passive deblends)

• WAPPco refers to the aperture photometry measured from the coadds; WAPP refers to the aperture photometry measured from the frames; WPRO refers to the profile-fitting photometry measured from the frames

• the reported WAPP mag uncertainty is the SQRT[unbiased sample variance], hence it is a measure of the source repeatibility; the standard deviation of the mean is just that value divided by the SQRT[N] samples; hence, the WPRO and WAPPco mag uncertainties should be compared with the standard deviation of the mean for WAPP.

• Mag offsets have been applied to WPRO in order to match with WAPPCO: -0.08,-0.05,-0.05,-0.08, for IRAC-1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

• the PSFuncs are clearly inadequate toward a realistic WPRO uncertainty model